Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc. 2020 Jan 31;79:247–257. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.015

Table 3.

Invariance Tests Across Language Brokering Efficacy for Fathers and Mothers.

χ2 (df) Δχ2 (Δdf) p-value CFI RMSEA SRMR
1. Base Model 342.42 (148) – – 0.95 0.04 0.05
2. Structural invariance
 a. Disc W1 to Brokering efficacy W1 344.32 (149) 1.90 (1) 0.17 0.92 0.05 0.05
 b. Disc W1 to Brokering efficacy W2 344.93 (149) 2.51 (1) 0.11 0.92 0.05 0.05
 c. Disc W2 to Brokering efficacy W2 343.93 (149) 1.51 (1) 0.22 0.92 0.05 0.05
 d. Brokering efficacy W1 to Academic W2 344.34 (149) 1.91 (1) 0.17 0.92 0.05 0.05
 e. Brokering efficacy W2 to academic W2 346.35 (149) 3.92 (1) 0.05 0.92 0.05 0.05
 f. Brokering efficacy W1 to Academic W1 342.75 (149) 0.32 (1) 0.57 0.92 0.05 0.05

Note. All model comparisons were made comparing to the base model. Disc = Discrimination; Academic = Academic Competence; W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2.