Table 3. Results of multivariate logistic regression models examining the relation between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and T2DM.
| No. T2DM (%) | Unadjusted | Sex- and ethnicity- adjusted | Fully adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95% CI) | p | OR(95% CI) | p | OR(95% CI) | p | ||
| DII as continuous variable per 1-piont increase | 419 | 1.05(1.02,1.08) | 0.001 | 1.06(1.03,1.08) | <0.001 | 1.05(1.02,1.08) | <0.001 |
| DII as categorical variable | |||||||
| Q1 | 60 | 1(reference) | 1(reference) | 1(reference) | |||
| Q2 | 63 | 1.05(0.73,1.51) | 0.81 | 1.12(0.77,1.62) | 0.55 | 1.12(0.77,1.62) | 0.55 |
| Q3 | 65 | 1.10(0.77,1.58) | 0.60 | 1.17(0.82,1.69) | 0.39 | 1.14(0.79,1.65) | 0.48 |
| Q4 | 66 | 1.11(0.77,1.59) | 0.58 | 1.18(0.82,1.70) | 0.37 | 1.15(0.80,1.66) | 0.46 |
| Q5 | 165 | 2.83(2.07,3.85) | <0.001 | 3.37(2.46,4.63) | <0.001 | 3.27(2.38,4.50) | <0.001 |