Table A.5.

Association between deprivation and the percentage of neighbourhood food outlets accessible online amongst postcode districts in England. Estimated using uncontrolled and controlled general linear models.

	Model 0a			Model 1a
Percentage accessible onlineb (%)	coef	95% CI		coef	95% CI
IMD score (deciles)
1 (4.28–10.21); least deprived	ref	–	–	ref	–	–
2 (10.22–12.08)	−9.72	−20.63	1.20	−8.17	−18.80	2.46
3 (12.09–14.00)	−16.41	−27.28	−5.55	−12.19	−22.85	−1.53
4 (14.01–15.91)	−14.35	−25.21	−3.48	−14.28	−24.90	−3.65
5 (15.92–18.18)	−20.05	−30.92	−9.17	−19.32	−29.95	−8.69
6 (18.19–20.60)	−21.84	−32.67	−11.00	−21.11	−31.72	−10.51
7 (20.61–23.54)	−30.34	−41.21	−19.48	−29.40	−40.10	−18.69
8 (23.55–27.06)	−16.54	−27.41	−5.68	−14.79	−25.58	−3.99
9 (27.07–32.89)	−10.59	−21.43	0.25	−11.06	−21.97	−0.16
10 (32.90–69.51); most deprived	0.05	−10.80	10.90	−3.38	−14.22	7.45

^a Model 0 = uncontrolled. 2104 postcode districts included. Model 1 = controlled for postcode district population density and rural urban classification. 2076 postcode districts included.

^b Percentage accessible online = The number of food outlets accessible online as a percentage of the number physically accessible in the neighbourhood. ‘Neighbourhood’ = 1600m Euclidean radius ‘neighbourhood’ buffer of postcode district geographic centroid.