Table 1.
Exposure | Outcome | Outcome description | Geography | Covariates added to controlled model |
---|---|---|---|---|
Postcode district relative deprivation, modelled as deciles (D): D1 = least deprived postcode districts. |
Percentage of food outlets registered to accept orders online | The number of food outlets registered to accept orders online, expressed as a percentage of the number of food outlets within a postcode district (bounded, 0–100%). | Postcode district | Postcode district rural urban classification |
Postcode district population density: usual residential and usual workday | ||||
Number of food outlets accessible online | The number of food outlets accessible online based on a postcode district being listed in the delivery area of a food outlet registered to accept orders online. | Postcode district | Postcode district rural urban classification | |
Number of food outlets in postcode district | ||||
Postcode district population density: usual residential and usual workday | ||||
Number of unique cuisine types accessible online | The number of unique cuisine types accessible online from food outlets registered to accept orders online who included a postcode district in their delivery area. | Postcode district | Postcode district rural urban classification | |
Number of food outlets in postcode district | ||||
Postcode district population density: usual residential and usual workday | ||||
Number of food outlets accessible online | ||||
Percentage of neighbourhood food outlets accessible online | The number of food outlets accessible online expressed as a percentage of the number physically accessible within the neighbourhood (unbounded, may exceed 100%). | 1600m Euclidean radius ‘neighbourhood’ buffer of postcode district geographic centroid | Postcode district rural urban classification | |
Postcode district population density: usual residential and usual workday |