Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;88(3):338–347. doi: 10.2319/081817-559.1

Table 4.

Results of the Cox Bi- and Multivariable Regression for the Identification of Factors Important for the Survival of Bracketsa

Factor
Category
Bivariable
Multivariable
HR (95% CI)
P
HR (95% CI)
P
Gender Female Referent NT
Male 1.00 (0.73–0.38) .98 NT
Age Per year 1.00 (0.92–1.08) .93 NT
Jaw Mandible Referent Referent
Maxilla 1.30 (0.99–1.69) .06 1.30 (1.00–1.70) .05
Deepbite No Referent NT
Yes 1.24 (0.91–1.67) .17 1.14 (0.85–1.52) .38
Crossbite No Referent NT
Yes 0.89 (0.58–1.37) .60 NT
Anterior crowding No Referent NT
Yes 0.92 (0.63–1.34) .66 NT
Mouth side Left Referent NT
Right 1.15 (0.88–1.51) .30 NT
Tooth Central incisor 1.72 (1.05–2.83) .03 1.74 (1.06–2.87) .03
Lateral incisor 1.87 (1.15–3.05) .01 1.89 (1.16–3.08) .01
Canine Referent Referent
First premolar 1.43 (0.85–2.40) .17 1.45 (0.86–2.43) .16
Second premolar 3.22 (2.04–5.08) <.001 3.19 (2.03–5.03) <.001
Tooth category Posterior, canines-premolars Referent NT
Anterior, incisors 0.98 (0.74–1.28) .86 NT
Bracket type SSCL Referent Referent
CeramicCL 1.64 (1.15–2.32) .006 1.62 (1.14–2.29) .007
SSSL 0.79 (0.54–1.15) .21 0.80 (0.55–1.18) .26
Ni-freeSL 0.96 (0.58–1.60) .89 1.01 (0.60–1.69) .98
Extraction case No Referent NT
Yes 0.85 (0.51–1.42) .54 NT
Auxiliary appliances used No Referent NT
Yes 1.00 (0.57–1.75) 1.00 NT
Missed appointment Per appointment 1.03 (0.98–1.09) .24 NT
Hygiene warning received No Referent NT
Yes 0.99 (0.73–1.35) .96 NT
a 

Results are given as hazard ratios with their 95% confidence intervals. HR indicates hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NT, not tested; SS, stainless steel; CL, conventionally ligated; SL, self-ligated.