Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 14;29(7):1167–1176.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.05.008

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dispersal patterns of gut bacteria and their link to bacterial evolution

(A) Dispersal patterns of bacteria were reflected in their associations: strong geographic and host association (spatiopersistent); strong family and host association (heredipersistent); no associations (non-persistent); all associations (tenacious); and average geographic or family and host associations (average persistent). The analysis was restricted to 50 high abundant genera.

(B) Tenacious taxa could be genetically well-adapted (high purifying selection [dN/dS], fewer selective sweeps [Tajima’s Ds], high population sizes [πS]), while non-persistent taxa show opposing population genetics. p values are calculated with a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, comparing all six groups.

(C) Tenacious bacteria are significantly more often transmitted vertically than horizontally in families, having a higher likelihood to be inherited between generations. Antibiotic usage usually reduces strain persistence, especially in adult hosts and tenacious bacteria. The color reflects the log10 OR (odds ratio), the value in the squares is the rounded, multiple testing corrected q value of Fisher’s exact test conducted separately for each square, q ≥ 0.1 are shown as white squares. Children are hosts < 3 years old. dN/dS, non-synonymous to synonymous nucleotide substitutions.; πS, synonymous nucleotide diversity; OR, odds ratio in Fisher’s exact test. Boxplot centers represent the median; the edges represent first and third quartiles.