Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;27(4):511–518. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20813

Table 5.

Diagnostic performances of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS based on different cutoff categories when NIFTP is accepted as a benign pathology

Malignant (n=57) Benign (n=194) SEN (%) SPE (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) PLR NLR
ACR-TIRADS 1–3 13 147 77 (64–87) 76 (69–82) 48 (38–59) 92 (87–96) 3.2 (2.4–4.2) 0.3 (0.2–0.5)
ACR-TIRADS 4–5 44 47

EU-TIRADS 1–3 13 155 77 (64–87) 80 (74–85) 53 (42–64) 92 (87–96) 3.8 (2.8–5.3) 0.3 (0.2–0.5)
EU-TIRADS 4–5 44 39

ACR-TIRADS 1–4 32 190 44 (31–58) 98 (95–99) 86 (68–96) 86 (80–90) 21 (8–59) 0.6 (0.5–0.7)
ACR-TIRADS 5 25 4

EU-TIRADS 1–4 25 187 56 (42–69) 96 (93–99) 82 (66–92) 88 (83–92) 16 (7–33) 0.5 (0.3–0.6)
EU-TIRADS 5 32 7

Data are presented as numbers or percentages. The numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

ACR-TIRADS, thyroid imaging reporting and data system of the American College of Radiology; EU-TIRADS, thyroid imaging reporting and data system of the European Thyroid Association; NIFTP, noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.