Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 11;2021:3192409. doi: 10.1155/2021/3192409

Table 1.

Stomatological characteristics of patients and control group participants (UWS: unstimulated saliva; TP: total protein; CODS: Clinical Oral Dryness Score; DMFT: Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth; API: approximal plaque index; SBI: sulcus bleeding index, PPD: periodontal pocket depth; NS: statistically insignificant).

Control, n = 25 HT, n = 25 p
UWS mL/min 0.67 (0.46–0.89) 0.27 (0.1–0.61) <0.0001
No. of women (%) with hyposalivation (UWS < 0.2 mL/min) 0 (0) 15 (60) <0.00001
TP NWS (mg/mL) 895 (658.23–1250.1) 1400 (1002.1-1600.56) <0.0001
CODS (1–10) 0 6 (1–10) <0.0001
No. of women with CODS ≥ 5 0 13 <0.0001
No. of women with CODS ≥ 1 ≤ 4 0 8 <0.001
Subjective oral dryness, n (%) 0 (0) 20 (80) <0.0001
DMFT 18 (15–25) 16 (14–25) NS
API 24.56 (0–30) 21.54 (0–32) NS
SBI 0.45 (0–1) 0.33 (0–1) NS
PPD (mm) 2.0 (0.5–2.5) 2.0 (0.5–2.5) NS