Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 5;85(5):1997–2011. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01363-8

Table 2.

Models predicting response accuracy in speech-only (mouth blurred), visible speech, and visible speech + gesture trials, age group = young and noise = SNR -18 are on the intercept. N = 56a

Speech-only (mouth blurred) Visible speech Visible speech + gesture
β SE z p β SE z p β SE z p
Intercept – .75 .07 – 11.07  < .001 .59 .13 4.60  < .001 1.91 .15 12.40  < .001
Hearing acuity (PTA) – .15 .05 – 3.12 .002
Age groupold b – .57 .18 – 3.13 .002 – .99 .20 – 4.93  < .001
Noiseclear 3.64 .15 24.29  < .001 3.17 .29 11.08  < .001 2.57 .40 6.44  < .001
NoiseSNR -24 – .24 .09 – 2.57 .01 – .37 .13 – 2.93 .003 – .25 .17 – 1.49 .14
Noisevisual-only n.a.c n.a n.a n.a – .51 .13 – 4.08  < .001 – .46 .16 – 2.78 .006
Age groupold: Noiseclear .60 .41 1.48 .14 .41 .50 .82 .41
Age groupold: NoiseSNR -24 .01 .18 .04 .97 .32 .22 1.47 .14
Age groupold: Noisevisual-only n.a n.a n.a n.a .43 .18 2.47 .01 .72 .21 3.33  < .001

aIn the model predicting response accuracy in the speech-only (mouth blurred) condition, N = 55

bA hyphen indicates a non-significant predictor that was eliminated in the model-comparison process

cNote that there were no visual-only trials in the speech-only (mouth blurred) condition