Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;11:14645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94243-z

Table 1.

Performance of therapy-based stratification.

Therapy Yes-no-yes No-no-yes No-no-no Yes-no-no Yes-yes-yes
n.p. 43 31 21 13 35
>5y 17 14 7 8 8
<5y 26 17 14 5 27
n.a. 37 30 21 13 30
Sen. 0.65 0.81 0.66 0.85 0.8
Spec. 0.92 0.78 0.8 0.66 0.84
OR 24.3 16.8 8.0 12.0 21.0
OR p-val 0.0006 0.002 0.11 0.1 0.01
CI-Lo 2.6 2.55 0.96 0.79 1.8
CI-Hi 221 111 66 180 240
Kappa 0.52 0.58 0.44 0.53 0.51
AUC 0.85 0.87 0.77 0.77 0.63
AUC p-val 0.0001 0.0002 0.02 0.06 0.13
lrt p-val 0.02 0.0006 0.06 0.33 0.03
lh 2 2 4 1 3
fp 7 12 17 8 5

Results on test data with automatic hyperparameter optimization and feature (gene) selection. Therapy class labels are (RAD, CHE, HOR). n.p. number of patients, n.a. number of answers. 95% confidence interval, lrt p-val p value for the log rank test, lh lookahead number, fp fingerprint size.