Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;11:14675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94174-9

Table 3.

Absolute and relative Apparent Permeability of metal(loid)s as measured by Caco-2 cell technique and percentage of metal(loid)s complexed.

Metal(loid) sources* Chelating agents/Gut bacteria Absolute App Permeability (× 10–6 cm/s)** Relative App Permeability*** % Complexed metal(loid)s
As—No IE Control 3.5600 100 10.2
As—with IE Control 2.8907 81.2 40.4
EDTA 2.5739 72.3 45.2
DMPS 2.1542 60.5 48.1
E. coli 2.6166 73.5 57.6
L. acidophilus 2.2855 64.2 63.2
Cd—No IE Control 0.8900 100 7.03
Cd—with IE Control 0.7405 83.2 22.4
EDTA 0.6728 75.6 35.3
DMPS 0.5527 62.1 41.4
E. coli 0.5367 60.3 65.4
L. acidophilus 0.4931 55.4 68.7
Hg—No IE Control 2.7500 100 8.01
Hg—with IE Control 2.2055 80.2 22.2
EDTA 1.9580 71.2 26.1
DMPS 1.7078 62.1 24.3
E. coli 1.9883 72.3 34.3
L. acidophilus 1.7133 62.3 37.6
Pb—No IE Control 0.1700 100 10.2
Pb—with IE Control 0.1399 82.3 33.2
EDTA 0.1229 72.3 36.4
DMPS 0.1022 60.1 37.3
E. coli 0.1059 62.3 63.3
L. acidophilus 0.0904 53.2 65.6

*NO IE, No Intestinal Extract; with IE, with Intestinal Extract; **Absolute Apparent permeability is calculated from Eq. (1) (× 10–6 cm/s); ***Relative Apparent permeability is calculated from Eq. (2); absolute permeability for metal(loid) alone (No IE) is taken as 100%

Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid (DMPS); Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus acidophilus.