Table 1.
Percentage misclassification error of the proposed method using exponential distance function 1 with 4 existing methods
| IMAGE | Prop method (exponential distance) | IFCM-1 | FCM | IFCM-2 | KFCM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mam-1 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 1.3 | 0.53 | 1.30 |
| Mam-2 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.98 | 1.26 |
| Mam-3 | 0.18 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 2.58 |
| Mam-4 | 1.35 | 1.64 | 1.69 | 2.49 | 1.58 |
| Mam-5 | 2.10 | 3.69 | 3.69 | 3.69 | 4.71 |
| Mam-6 | 3.28 | 3.99 | 6.18 | 6.59 | 9.48 |
| Mam_7 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.19 |
| Mam_8 | 0.47 | 1.12 | 1.35 | 1.22 | 1.30 |
| Mam-9 | 0.12 | 0.75 | 1.2 | 1.16 | 2.06 |
| Mam-10 | 3.86 | 4.27 | 9.13 | 8.07 | 4.82 |
| Mam-11 | 3.01 | 5.61 | 5.63 | 5.63 | 6.53 |
| Mam-12 | 1.93 | 5.03 | 4.8 | 3.31 | 4.9 |
| Mam-13 | 0.11 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Mam-14 | 0.30 | 0.71 | 1.6 | 0.74 | 1.50 |
| Mam-15 | 0.95 | 4.02 | 3.01 | 4.02 | 2.08 |
| Mam-16 | 1.48 | 3.37 | 2.76 | 2.16 | 3.79 |
| Mam-17 | 1.11 | 4.31 | 1.92 | 3.70 | 2.17 |
| Mam-18 | 0.79 | 2.98 | 4.74 | 0.92 | 3.62 |
| Mam-19 | 2.30 | 4.99 | 2.37 | 2.69 | 5.62 |
| Mam-20 | 1.07 | 4.12 | 2.38 | 2.96 | 5.53 |
| TOTAL | 1.26 | 2.65 | 2.77 | 2.62 | 3.28 |