Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 19;11:14641. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94162-z

Table 2.

Results of individual differences analysis (correlating theta power and ITC with accuracy and RT for each cognitive control strategy).

Strategy ACC RT
Proactive theta power (dB) r = .14, p = .14 r = .07, p = .33
Reactive theta power (dB) r = −.02, p = .79 r = .18, p = .02*
Inhibitory theta power (dB) r = .12, p = .11 #
Response Conflict theta power (dB) r = −.03, p = .72 r = .016, p = .83
Proactive theta ITC r = .1, p = .19 r = .06, p = .46
Reactive theta ITC r = −.22, p = .003** r = .04, p = .57
Inhibitory theta ITC r = .11, p = .17 #
Response Conflict theta ITC r = .05, p = .50 r = .19, p = .01*

*p < .05, **p < .01.

Correlations represent Pearson correlations with 174 degrees of freedom.