Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 25;51(4):241–249. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.4.241

Table 3.

Comparison of resorption volumes (mm3) of six different surface among the groups

Group Buccal cervical Buccal middle Buccal apical Lingual cervical Lingual middle Lingual apical
Hybrid 0.007 ± 0.012a 0.000 ± 0.001a 0.001 ± 0.001a 0.002 ± 0.004a 0.002 ± 0.005a 0.001 ± 0.002a
Hyrax 0.071 ± 0.049b 0.090 ± 0.124b 0.030 ± 0.020b 0.034 ± 0.050b 0.030 ± 0.030b 0.009 ± 0.010b
Acrylic bonded 0.053 ± 0.020b 0.069 ± 0.042b 0.041 ± 0.026b 0.025 ± 0.027b 0.032 ± 0.027b 0.024 ± 0.014c
Full coverage 0.051 ± 0.031b 0.040 ± 0.020b 0.040 ± 0.025b 0.016 ± 0.018b 0.016 ± 0.024b 0.003 ± 0.007a
p-value 0.0001*** 0.0001*** 0.0001* 0.017* 0.0001*** 0.002**

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

According to the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance test and the Mann–Whitney U test (with Bonferroni correction), there is no statistically significant difference between groups with the same letters.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.