Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;10(14):4721–4733. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4020

TABLE 4.

Subgroup analysis according to the Cold–Heat & Deficiency‐Excess pattern identification according to the traditional medicine theory

Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) score

Mean difference

(Mx–UC)

p

Mean difference

(Mx–SMx)

p
Cold pattern
Week 9 −1.64 (−2.27, −1.00) <0.001* −0.06 (−0.83, 0.70) 0.870
Week 13 −2.16 (−2.96, −1.36) <0.001* −1.21 (−2.10, −0.32) 0.009*
Heat pattern
Week 9 −0.56 (−2.71, 1.60) 0.561 0.35 (−2.33, 3.04) 0.751
Week 13 −1.46 (−3.41, 0.50) 0.121 −0.40 (−3.76, 2.96) 0.772
Deficiency pattern
Week 9 −1.50 (−2.49, 0.52) 0.004* −0.51 (−1.62, 0.60) 0.355
Week 13 −1.93 (−3.14, −0.73) 0.003* −1.04 (−2.25, 0.18) 0.092
Excess pattern
Week 9 −1.54 (−2.33, −0.76) <0.001* 0.41 (−0.56, 1.37) 0.394
Week 13 −2.35 (−3.27, −1.43) <0.001* −1.31 (−2.52, −0.11) 0.034*

Data shown as mean differences (95% Confidence Interval). Mx, moxibustion group; UC, usual care group; SMx, sham moxibustion group.

*

p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.