Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Apr 20;2(4):210–219. doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-0170-9

Extended Data Figure 2:

Extended Data Figure 2:

Temporal dynamics in the A and R units in the PredNet. The average response of A and R units to a set of naturalistic objects on a gray background, after training on the KITTI car-mounted camera dataset [13] is shown (expanding upon Fig. 3 in the main text). The A and R layers seem to generally exhibit on/off dynamics, similar to the E layers. R1 also seems to have another mode in its response, specifically a ramp up between time steps 3 and 5 post image onset. The responses are grouped per layer and consist of an average across all the units (all filters and spatial locations) in a layer. The mean responses were then normalized between 0 and 1. Given the large number of units in each layer, the s.e.m. is O(1%) of the mean. Responses for layer 0, the pixel layer, are omitted because of their heavy dependence on the input pixels for the A and R layers. Note that, by notation in the network’s update rules, the input image reaches the R layers at a time step after the E and A layers.