Table 4.
Linear Regression Results for Childhood Maltreatment Predicting Executive Function
| DV: | CTQ Total | ||||
| EF (model 1) | B=−.11, p=.015 | ||||
| EF (model 2) | B=−.10, p=.022 | ||||
| EF (model 3) | B=−.10, p=.028 | ||||
| DV1: | CTQ SA | CTQ PA | CTQ EA | CTQ PN | CTQ EN |
| EF (model 1) | B=.00, p=.914 | B=−.10, p=.051 | B=.09, p=.123 | B=.03, p=.530 | B=−.18, p=.003 |
| EF (model 2) | B=.00, p=.983 | B=−.10, p=.058 | B=.10, p=.068 | B=.04, p=.428 | B=−.19, p<.001 |
| EF (model 3) | B=.01, p=.891 | B=−.10, p=.051 | B=.10, p=.099 | B=.04, p=.447 | B=−.17, p=.002 |
| Covariates model 1: IQ, motor speed, IDAS General Depression, Well-being (reverse-scored), Social Anxiety, and Panic model 2: IQ, motor speed, IDAS Trauma Intrusions, and Trauma Avoidance model 3: IQ, motor speed, PID-5 Depressivity and Anxiousness | |||||
Note. CTQ=Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, SA=Sexual Abuse, PA=Physical Abuse, EA=Emotional Abuse, PN=Physical Neglect, EN=Emotional Neglect
1
CTQ subscales were entered as simultaneous predictors at predicting EF