Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;125(2):240–246. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01377-y

Table 1.

Circulating proteins and the development of liver metastasis—the separate cohorts.

SAM analysis Univariable Cox regression analysis
D Q N (%) HR (95% CI)a P
Investigation cohortb
 CXCL2 2.14 0 121 (99.2) 1.001 (1.000–1.002) 0.011
 ANGPT2 1.55 0 121 (99.2) 1.000 (1.000–1.000) 0.833
 sCD40 1.51 0 121 (99.2) 1.004 (1.001–1.007) 0.007
 TNFRSF10B 1.35 0 121 (99.2) 1.000 (0.998–1.002) 0.904
 FLT3LG 0.95 7.73 116 (95.1) 0.996 (0.982–1.011) 0.618
 VEGFA 0.88 7.73 101 (82.8) 1.000 (1.000–1.000) 0.849
Validation cohort 1
 CXCL2 79 (100) 1.001 (0.999–1.002) 0.249
 sCD40 79 (100) 1.003 (1.000–1.006) 0.040
Validation cohort 2c
 sCD40 129 (95.6) 1.001 (1.000–1.002) 0.029
Validation cohort 3d
 sCD40 55 (93.2) 1.003 (1.000–1.006) 0.044

ANGPT2 angiopoietin-2, CI confidence interval, CXCL2 C–X-C motif chemokine ligand 2, D likelihood score, FLT3LG fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, HR hazard ratio, Q false discovery rate, SAM Significance Analysis for Microarrays, sCD40 soluble cluster of differentiation molecule 40, TNFRSF10B tumour necrosis factor superfamily member 10B, VEGFA vascular endothelial growth factor A.

aHR above 1 indicates enhanced probability for the event. Patients were omitted from the analyses because they developed lung metastasis before the first occurrence of liver metastasis: bone cand additional three patients without metastatic disease who were lost to follow-up.

dAdditional two patients who died without metastatic disease.