Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;125(2):240–246. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01377-y

Table 2.

Prognostic factors and the development of liver metastasis—all cohorts.

Univariable Cox regression analysis Multivariable Cox regression analysis
N (%)a HR (95%CI)b P N (%)a HR (95%CI)b P
sCD40 389 (98) 1.002 (1.001–1.002) <0.001 233 (59) 1.001 (1.000–1.002) 0.006
CEA 326 (83) 0.999 (0.987–1.011) 0.892 233 (59) 0.988 (0.966–1.010) 0.280
TRG 286 (72) 1.844 (1.246–2.729) 0.002 233 (59) 1.781 (1.028–3.084) 0.039
ypT 286 (72) 1.838 (1.270–2.661) 0.001 233 (59) 1.522 (0.966–2.399) 0.070

CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, sCD40 soluble cluster of differentiation molecule 40, TRG tumour regression grade, ypT histologic tumour stage following neoadjuvant treatment.

aPatients who developed lung metastasis (six cases) before the first occurrence of liver metastasis were omitted from the analysis.

bHR above 1 indicates enhanced probability for the event.