Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 14;6(3):132. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6030132

Table 2.

Demographic details, sensitivity, and specificity for study participants (N = 179) tested for LF antigen with both Filariasis Test Strip (FTS) and immunochromatographic test (ICT), American Scheme 2016.

Number Tested FTS-Positive (%) ICT-Positive (%) Sensitivity of ICT Compared to FTS (%) Specificity of ICT Compared to FTS (%)
Overall 179 112 (62.6) 105 (58.7) 93.8 (87.5–97.5) 100 (94.6–100)
Age groups
≤14 years 37 20 (54.1) 19 (51.4) 95.0 (75.1–99.9) 100 (80.5–100.0)
15–44 years 74 42 (56.8) 40 (54.1) 95.2 (83.8–99.4) 100 (89.1–100.0)
≥45 years 68 50 (73.5) 46 (67.7) 92.0 (80.8–97.8) 100 (81.5–100.0)
Sex
Male 107 76 (71.0) 70 (65.4) 92.1 (83.6–97.0) 100 (88.8–100.0)
Female 72 36 (50.0) 35 (48.6) 97.2 (85.5–99.9) 100 (90.3–100.0)
FTS-positive/Mf status
Mf-positive 28 # 28 (100.0) 28 (100.0) 100 (87.7–100.0) * 100 $
Mf-negative 72 # 72 (100.0) 65 (90.3) 90.3 (81.0–96.0) 100.0 (94.6–100.0)

* one-sided, 97.5% confidence interval # slides were only available for persons who were FTS-positive. $ FTS and ICT results were 100% concordant for persons who were FTS- and Mf-positive.