Table 1.
Project Outcome | Data Analysis # | External Evaluation Findings |
---|---|---|
Decentralisation and Strengthening of Child TB Services | ||
Proportion of all diagnosed child TB cases by health facility level * | Baseline: 96% at level V, 3% at level IV and 1% at level III By end implementation (Q4 2016): 50% at level V, 21% at level IV and 29% at level III |
The DETECT model demonstrated that child TB services can be successfully decentralised with the greatest increase in detection occurring at the level III facility in both districts. |
Health worker knowledge, Wakiso District | Average (range) test score Baseline: 40 (28–70)% Implementation: 75 (64–89)% |
The ability and confidence of health workers in peripheral health facilities to diagnose TB in children was improved and the numbers of of unnecessary referrals were reduced. |
Health worker knowledge, Kabarole District | Average (range) test score Baseline: 45 (32–64)% Implementation: 78 (68–96)% |
|
Number of functional TB basic management units for diagnosis and treatment by district | Baseline: 24 in Kabarole and 41 in Wakiso District By end implementation: 30 in Kabarole and 46 in Wakiso District |
Repair of non-functional microscopes and re-training of laboratory personnel benefit TB services and detection for all ages. Improved laboratory and drug supplies with reduced stock-outs. |
Changes to TB Case Detection and Treatment Outcomes | ||
Caseload of child TB and as a proportion of total TB notifications | 139% increase in 0–14 years Baseline: 271, 8.8% Implementation: 647, 14.9% |
The majority of respondents from the focus group discussions and in-depth interviews felt that the project had improved delivery of TB services, as it had accomplished the following:
|
TB cases in young children, proportion of all child TB cases | Increase in <5 years ageBaseline: 99, 36.5% Implementation: 324, 50.1% |
|
Bacteriologically confirmed (BC) TB cases in children | 61% increase in BC cases detected, but proportion with BC remained low in children. Baseline: 44 (9 young) children 0–14 years: 44/171 = 16% BC <5 years: 9/99 = 9% BC Implementation: 71 (16 young) children 0–14 years: 71/647 = 11% BC <5 years: 16/324 = 5% BC |
|
Cases of TB in older adolescents and adults | 32% increase Baseline: 2805 Implementation: 3693 |
|
Treatment success, cure or treatment complete | Significant improvement Baseline: 65% Implementation: 81% |
|
Died or treatment failure | Reduction in poor outcomes: Baseline: 15% Implementation: 4% |
|
Household Child Contact Screening and Management ^ | ||
Training and support of community health workers to implement | 178 (target was 168) community health workers received training | At least two per facility were trained over 2 days, provided with job aides and recording tools, linked with the facility-based TB focal person for ongoing mentorship and supervision. |
Households screened | 1617 households with 2270 child contacts | The project increased screening of households of smear-positive TB patients by 142%. |
Child contacts with positive symptom screen | 602 (27%) of 2270 child contacts were symptomatic | Screening symptoms used were cough, weight loss or poor weight gain, fever or lethargy/reduced playfulness. |
Child contacts evaluated for TB disease | 486 (81%) of 602 symptomatic child contacts | 19% of symptomatic child contacts did not present to the health facility for further evaluation. |
Child contacts diagnosed with TB | 55 child TB cases detected | Lower numbers than expected for overall case detection—2.4% of all child contacts. Of symptomatic child contacts who presented to the facility for evaluation, 11% diagnosed with TB. |
Child contacts eligible for TPT | 910 young child contacts without active TB identified | Challenges with availability of isoniazid-alone preparation for TPT at beginning of project. |
Eligible child contacts who initiated IPT | 670 or 77% of 910 eligible | Remarkable improvements in IPT uptake noted in both districts over time but lower than the 90% target. |
Child contacts who completed IPT | 569 or 85% of 670 who commenced IPT | Although short of the 90% target, a high rate of completion. |
TB: tuberculosis; TPT: tuberculosis preventive treatment; IPT: isoniazid preventive treatment. # Comparison was between two separate 18-month periods: baseline or pre-implementation was January 2014–June 2015; and implementation was July 2015–December 2016. * Level V: regional referral hospital for the district; level IV: secondary level health facility with laboratory and inpatient care; level III: primary level health facility with sputum smear microscopy available. ^ Routine household screening by community health workers was introduced by the project, and so there were no baseline programmatic data.