Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 21;19:114. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00800-6

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Immunoexpression and comparison of PD-L2 in normal, eutopic and ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis treated with and without mifepristone. a Ectopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); b Ectopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); c Eutopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); d Eutopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); e Normal endometrium of proliferative phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 47); f Normal endometrium of secretory phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 27); g Ectopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); h and i. Eutopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); j Immunoscore comparation of PD-L2 between each groups,* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. a- i magnification: × 100;