Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;11(14):9848–9855. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7815

TABLE 1.

Table of contrasts between slopes resulting from the interaction between treatment (i.e., negative control, fungus, Tween) and copulatory courtship (i.e., number of leg contacts, number of antennal contacts) and copulation duration (response variable = number of eggs laid)

Contrast Estimate SE z p
Treatments × leg contacts
Fungus–negative −0.00403 0.00264 −1.526 .2786
Fungus–tween −0.00670 0.00261 −2.570 .0274
Negative–tween −0.00268 0.00220 −1.216 .4438
Treatments × antennal contacts
Fungus–negative −0.00313 0.00194 −1.614 .2395
Fungus–tween −0.00769 0.00176 −4.383 <.0001
Negative–tween −0.00457 0.00143 −3.197 .0040
Treatments × copulation duration
Fungus–negative −0.00777 0.00176 −4.421 <.0001
Fungus–tween 0.00338 0.00192 1.755 .1850
Negative–tween 0.01115 0.00185 6.013 <.0001

p‐values in bold indicate significant differences between slopes with an α of .05.