Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;11(14):9848–9855. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7815

TABLE 2.

Table of contrasts between slopes resulting from the interaction between treatment (i.e., negative control, fungus, Tween) and copulatory courtship (i.e., number of leg contacts, number of antennal contacts) and copulation duration (response variable = proportion of egg hatching)

Contrast Estimate SE z p
Treatments × leg contacts
Fungus–negative −0.01327 0.00440 −3.017 0.0072
Fungus–tween −0.00966 0.00416 −2.324 0.0525
Fungus–tween 0.00361 0.00290 1.246 0.4261
Treatments × copulation duration
Fungus–negative 0.000336 0.00261 0.129 0.9909
Fungus–tween 0.008321 0.00299 2.784 0.0148
Negative–tween 0.007985 0.00298 2.677 0.0203

p‐values in bold indicate significant differences between slopes with an α of .05.