. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 21.

Published in final edited form as: Eur J Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan 24;36(5):889–900. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000567

Table 3.

Results of multi-group CFA

	AIC	BIC	χ²	df	CFI	RMSEA	SRMR	ΔCFI	ΔRMSEA	ΔSRMR
Configural invariance	5772.6	6502.3	989.079^***	518	0.846	0.067 [CI 0.061-0.073]	0.075	-	-
Weak factorial invariance	5843.3	6480.7	1049.561^***	541	0.833	0.068 [CI 0.062-0.074]	0.085	0.013	−0.001	−0.010
Partial weak factorial invariance^a	5784.8	6426.2	1012.479^***	540	0.845	0.066 [CI 0.060-0.071]	0.081	0.001	0.001	−0.006
Strong factorial invariance	6041.4	6598.6	1280.871^***	561	0.764	0.079 [CI 0.074-0.085]	0.093	0.081	−0.013	−0.015
Partial strong factorial invariance^b	5797.9	6395.2	1047.202^***	551	0.837	0.067 [CI 0.061-0.072]	0.083	0.008	−0.001	−0.002

Note.

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001.

CFI and RMSEA are scaled. Δ represents the difference between the less restricted model and the more restricted model.

partialized for item 8,

partialized for items 4, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, and 25.