Table 14.
Summary of CSF literature extraction for the outcome ‘period between earliest point of infection and suspicion report’
| Reference | Country | Year | Species/farm type | Period (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elbers et al. (1999) | Netherlands | 1992 | Pig/NA | 421 |
| Laevens et al. (1998) | Belgium | 1993 | Pig/fattening | 182 |
| Elbers et al. (1999) | Netherlands | 1997 | Pig/mixed Insemination center | 423 304 |
| Elbers et al. (1999) | Germany | 1997 | Pig/NA | 561 |
| Elbers et al. (1999) | Spain | 1997 | Pig/NA | 631 |
| Mintiens et al. (2001) | Belgium | 1997 | Pig/fattening | 195 |
| Moennig et al. (2013) | Germany | 2006 | Pig/NA | 706 |
| David et al. (2011) OIE (2009) | Israel | 2009 | Pig/closed | 217 |
NA: Not available.
Primary outbreak. Based on date of arrival of infected pig from Germany.
Primary outbreak. Based on the serological findings at depopulation (See method described in Stegeman et al. (1999)).
Secondary outbreak. Based on the serological findings at depopulation (See method described in Stegeman et al. (1999)). As the most likely route of infection, it is presumed that CSFV was introduced into the AI centre during or after the removal and transport of four boars by an external transporter.
Secondary outbreak. Based on the date when weaned pigs originating from the primary infected herd were introduced and probably served as a source of infection.
Primary outbreak. No information on estimation method; From Table in Moennig et al. (2013).
Primary outbreak. Based on the date when the index case was artificially inseminated with imported semen from Germany.