Table 4.
Correlation coefficients of the whole phase localized concern index and localized concern index by patient percentage and some indicators.
| Index and prefecture | Value | ||
| Highest localized concern index | |||
|
|
Tokyo | 7.04 | |
|
|
Ibaraki | 5.90 | |
|
|
Fukuoka | 5.54 | |
|
|
Saitama | 5.31 | |
|
|
Okayama | 4.92 | |
| Lowest localized concern index | |||
|
|
Miyazaki | 0.63 | |
|
|
Ehime | 0.87 | |
|
|
Mie | 0.96 | |
|
|
Miyagi | 1.02 | |
|
|
Wakayama | 1.07 | |
| Highest localized concern index by patient percentage | |||
|
|
Okayama | 14.36 | |
|
|
Ibaraki | 14.31 | |
|
|
Niigata | 13.78 | |
|
|
Nagano | 13.48 | |
|
|
Aomori | 13.46 | |
| Lowest localized concern index by patient percentage | |||
|
|
Miyazaki | 8.68 | |
|
|
Ehime | 9.18 | |
|
|
Gunma | 9.23 | |
|
|
Okinawa | 9.30 | |
|
|
Shiga | 9.43 | |