Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Journal Mass Commun Q. 2017 Jan 19;94(2):486–514. doi: 10.1177/1077699016687724

Table 5.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Changes in Quality of Life and Depression.

Model 1: Quality of life change (n = 186) Model 2: CES-D change (n = 186)
B SE β B SE β
Block 1: Control variables
 Age .00 .00 −.06 .01 .01 .11
 Race (minority = 1) .13 .13 .07 .12 .21 .04
 Education − .03 .02 − .12 .01 .03 .03
 Income − .03 .02 − .10 .02 .04 .04
 Living alonga − .08 .10 − .06 .05 .16 .02
 Study conditionb − .04 .04 − .08 .04 .06 .04
 Total volume of writingc − .08** .04 − .29** .08 .06 .17
 Total volume of readingc .04 .02 .21 − .03 .03 − .11
Δ R2 (F change) .08 (1.96) .04 (0.08)
Block 2: Receiving ES
 From new patientsc .00 .00 .01 .00 .00 .01
 From survivorsc .01* .00 .24* − .00*** 0 − .32***
Δ R2 (F change) .04* (3.61) .07** (6.47)
Total R2 (F) .118* (2.34) .102* (1.99)

Note. CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale; ES = emotional support; CHESS = Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System.

a

Living alone is coded as (0) no and (1) yes.

b

Study condition is coded as (0) CHESS information and communication services only group and (1) full CHESS and mentor group and full CHESS group.

c

Values were log transformed.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.