Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;81(14):2929–2943.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.05.033

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, image processing, and model refinement statistics

HCN4holo HCN4apo/LC HCN4apo/AM

Data collection and image processing

Microscope Titan Krios Titan Krios TALOS Arctica
Voltage (kV) 300 300 200
Camera K2 Summit K2 Summit Falcon 3EC
Magnification 29,000 29,000 120,000
Total electron dose (e-2) 67.88 71.85 40.0
Defocus range (μm) −1 to −1.8 −1.1 to −2 −0.5 to −2.0
Pixel size (Å) 0.84 0.834 0.889
Micrographs (no.) 4,478 4,465 1,571
Symmetry imposed C4 C4 C4
Initial particle images (no.) 2,006,780 914,005 and 1,039,436 100,130
Final particle images (no.) 54,828 51,758 11,406
Resolution (Å) (fourier shell correlation threshold) 3.2 (0.143) 3.2 (0.143) 3.6 (0.143)
Sharpening B-factor (Å2) −77.8 −80.3 −52
EMDB code EMD-12513 EMD-12512 EMD-12466

Model refinement

Nonhydrogen atoms 16,588 16,128 15,436
Protein residues 2,004 1,960 1,876
cAMP molecules 4
N-acetyl-d-glucosamine molecules 4
Root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs)
Bond lengths (Å) 0.008 0.008 0.010
Bond angles (°) 0.960 0.917 1.158
Ramachandran plot
Favored (%) 97.19 92.32 93.98
Allowed (%) 2.81 7.68 6.02
Disallowed (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Validation
Molprobity score 1.52 2.29 2.09
Clashscore 6.75 16.35 15.25
Poor rotamers (%) 0.22 1.35 0.88
EM-Ringer Score 3.75 2.64 1.55
Map-model correlation 0.84 0.82 0.80
PDB code 7NP4 7NP3 7NMN