Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;22(4):bbaa312. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa312

Figure 6 .


Figure 6

Panel A and B display the performance comparison of AntiCP_AAC, AntiCP_DC, Hajisharifi’s method, iACP, ACPred-FL and ACPredStackL on the Tyagi2013 dataset. Panel C and D illustrate performance comparison of AntiCP_AAC, AntiCP_DC, Hajisharifi’s method, iACP, ACPred_FL, PEPred_Suite and ACPRed_Fuse on the Rao2019 dataset. Note that the values on the y axis represents performance scores of evaluation metrics.