Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 21;16(7):e0254344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254344

Table 2. Overview of nine genes showing significantly different DGE in post-exposure relative to pre-exposure samples.

Males Females
treatment mRNA species n (pre-exposure) n (60 days after irr.) mean Ct-value (pre-exposure) mean Ct-value (60 days after irr.) Fold-change p-value ROC n (pre-exposure) n (60 days after irr.) mean Ct-value (pre-exposure) mean Ct-value (60 days after irr.) Fold-change p-value ROC
without treatment CD248 14 1 15.3 17.8 0.2   1.0 22 2 15.5 17.7 0.2 0.08 0.91
with treatment, IL-12 1 3 15.1 17.7 0.2   1.0 5 1 14.8 17.7 0.1   1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 3 15.0 17.8 0.1 0.002 1.0 9 2 14.4 16.0 0.3 0.027 0.94
all 33 7 15.1 17.8 0.2 <0.0001 1.0 36 5 15.1 16.7 0.3 0.003 0.87
without treatment EDAR 16 2 13.6 17.6 0.1 0.002 1.0 22 3 13.3 15.4 0.2 0.0002 0.99
with treatment, IL-12 1 5 12.5 16.5 0.1   1.0 5 3 13.6 17.5 0.1 0.0001 1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 8 13.38 17.38 0.1 <0.0001 1.0 9 3 13.1 16.2 0.1 0.001 1.0
all 35 15 13.5 17.1 0.1 <0.0001 0.99 36 9 13.3 16.4 0.1 <0.0001 0.99
without treatment FAM19A5 15 3 15.16 17.3 0.2 0.08 0.87 17 2 15.9 16.7 0.6 0.4 0.69
with treatment, IL-12 1 5 12.5 16.1 0.1   1.0 3 3 17.2 17.1 1.0 0.95 0.5
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 15 9 15.9 17.1 0.4 0.012 0.83 8 3 15.2 17.1 0.3 0.11 0.88
all 31 17 15.4 16.9 0.4 0.0021 0.78 28 8 15.8 17.0 0.4 0.004 0.75
without treatment GAL3ST4 16 2 14.2 17.6 0.1 0.08 1.0 22 2 14.4 15.7 0.4 0.07 1.0
with treatment, IL-12 1 4 13.95 17.4 0.1   1.0 5 1 14.9 17.1 0.2   1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 5 14.8 17.5 0.2 <0.0001 0.99 9 3 14.1 16.2 0.2 0.15  
all 35 11 14.5 17.5 0.1 <0.0001 0.99 36 6 14.4 16.2 0.3 <0.0001 0.92
without treatment GCNT4 17 6 11.2 15.4 0.1 <0.0001 1.0 23 3 11.3 12.9 0.3 0.095 0.94
with treatment, IL-12 1 6 9.9 14.3 0.0   1.0 5 3 11.0 15.2 0.1 <0.0001 1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 14 11.1 14.9 0.1 <0.0001 1.0 9 6 10.6 14.9 0.1 0.004 1.0
all 36 26 11.1 14.9 0.1 <0.0001   37 12 11.1 14.5 0.1 <0.0001 0.96
without treatment HBG2_HBG1 18 6 10.18 5.17 32.2 0.002 0.91 23 3 8.5 10.6 0.2 0.1 0.87
with treatment, IL-12 1 6 7.5 5 5.7     5 3 9.8 4.8 32.0 0.035 1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 14 8.75 6.6 4.4 0.0025 0.86 9 6 9.1 5.5 12.1 0.048 0.83
all 37 26 9.4 5.9 11.3 <0.0001 0.86 37 12 8.8 6.6 4.6 0.07 0.68
without treatment LRRN1 21 5 12.24 15.52 0.1 0.0008 0.93 22 3 12.2 15.0 0.1 0.005 0.94
with treatment, IL-12 1 6 12 14.95 0.1   0.83 5 3 12.6 14.6 0.3 0.029 1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 11 12.8 16.3 0.1 <0.0001 0.99 9 5 12.5 14.8 0.2 0.014 0.89
all 40 22 12.5 15.77 0.1 <0.0001 0.94 36 11 12.3 14.8 0.2 <0.0001 0.92
without treatment NOG 20 6 11.64 15.96 0.1 <0.0001 1.0 23 3 11.6 13.3 0.3 0.049 0.96
with treatment, IL-12 1 6 10.8 15.5 0.0   1.0 5 3 11.5 16.1 0.0 0.0002 1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 14 11.3 15.5 0.1 <0.0001 1.0 9 6 10.7 15.2 0.0 0.004  
all 39 26 11.4 15.4 0.1 <0.0001   37 12 11.3 15.0 0.1 <0.0001 0.96
without treatment SYT14 15 1 16.04 17.69 0.3     22 2 15.5 16.8 0.4 0.15 0.86
with treatment, IL-12 1 2 15.5 16.4 0.5   1.0 5 1 15.8 18.0 0.2   1.0
with treatment, IL-12+G-CSF 18 4 15.9 17.2 0.4 0.008 0.9 9 3 15.4 16.2 0.6 0.2 0.72
all 34 7 16 17.1 0.5 0.011   36 6 15.5 16.7 0.4 0.016 0.8

Overview of nine genes that were significantly different in post-exposure relative to pre-exposure samples and expressed in ≥ 50% of samples per group. Data are presented separately for male (left part) and female rhesus macaques (right part) and ordered starting with untreated, treated (IL-12 and IL-12 + G-CSF), and untreated and treated groups combined (all). The number of measurements and the mean gene expression (threshold cycle, Ct) values are provided by pre- and post-exposure samples as well as the fold-change difference (derived from Ct-values applying the ΔΔ-Ct-approach). For instance, fold-changes of 0.1 or 10 are referring to a 10-fold down-regulation or up-regulation, respectively. A t-test was applied for this group comparison. P-values (chisquare statistic) of the category “all” are presented in bold when surviving Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison. ROC areas were derived from logistic regression analysis.