Table 3. Distribution of the socio-demographic variables with respect to any type of current substance use.
| Variables | Substance users (n; %) | Substance non-users (n; %) | χ2 test value | df | p-value | OR; 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 47; 20.7% | 180; 79.3% | 42.856 | 1 | <0.001 | 51.178 (6.989–374.772) |
| Female | 1; 0.5% | 196; 99.5% | Reference | |||
| Study group | ||||||
| Science | 17; 7.1% | 221; 92.9% | 12.069 | 2 | 0.002 | 0.263 (0.117–0.591) |
| Business | 19; 14.3% | 114; 85.7% | 0.569 (0.254–1.275) | |||
| Arts | 12; 22.6% | 41; 77.4% | Reference | |||
| Religion | ||||||
| Muslim | 45; 11.4% | 350; 88.6% | 0.030 | 1 | 0.864 | 1.114 (0.324–3.830) |
| Others | 3; 10.3% | 26; 89.7% | Reference | |||
| Daily exercise or play | ||||||
| Yes | 20; 13.5% | 128; 86.5% | 1.097 | 1 | 0.295 | 1.389 (0.750–2.573) |
| No | 27; 10.1% | 240; 89.9% | Reference | |||
| First ten years of life lived in | ||||||
| Metropolitan city | 5; 17.9% | 23; 82.1% | 1.367 | 3 | 0.713 | 1.739 (0.557–5.428) |
| District town | 6; 10.7% | 50; 89.3% | 0.960 (0.340–2.710 | |||
| Upazilla town | 24; 10.5% | 204; 89.5% | 0.941 (0.452–1.961) | |||
| Village | 12; 11.1% | 96; 88.9% | Reference | |||
| Living with family | ||||||
| Yes | 45; 11.6% | 343; 88.4% | 1.032 | 1 | 0.310 | 2.099 (0.487–9.057) |
| No | 2; 5.9% | 32; 94.1% | Reference | |||
| Having a personal room in the house | ||||||
| Yes | 37; 11.5% | 286; 88.5% | 1.178 | 1 | 0.278 | 1.589 (0.684–3.693) |
| No | 7; 7.5% | 86; 92.5% | Reference | |||
| Having a good family influence on life (perception) | ||||||
| Yes | 39; 10.1% | 346; 89.9% | 6.910 | 1 | 0.009 | 0.306 (0.121–0.774) |
| No | 7; 26.9% | 19; 73.1% | Reference | |||