Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 21;223(4):670–675. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.009

Table 2.

Impact of COVID-19 on practice volume, compensation, and staff.

Survey Participants (n = 77)
Elective Surgeries Suspended
 Yes 77 (100 %)
 No 0 (0 %)
Urgent Procedures Continued (n = 75)
 Yes 67 (89.3 %)
 No 8 (10.7 %)
Reassignment Outside Routine Practice
 None 48 (62.3 %)
 General Surgery Call 20 (26.0 %)
 Ancillary Service for COVID patients 11 (14.3 %)
 Trauma Surgery Call 5 (6.5 %)
 Medicine/Pulmonary Service 5 (6.5 %)
 Critical Care Unit 3 (3.9 %)
 Other 2 (2.6 %)
 Median backlog of operations (IQR) 30 (15–50)
Strategies to Schedule Backlog
 Normal Block Time 60 (90.9 %)
 Extended Hours 19 (28.8 %)
 Additional Facility 7 (10.6 %)
 Weekends 5 (7.6 %)
 Other 4 (6.1 %)
Impact on Compensation
 Yes 54 (70.1 %)
 No 23 (29.9 %)
How Compensation Impacted (n = 54)
 Volume-based revenue 32 (59.3 %)
 Base Salary 19 (35.2 %)
 Academic Funds 18 (33.3 %)
 Retirement Benefits/Contributions 16 (29.6 %)
 Research Funds 4 (7.4 %)
 Other 3 (5.6 %)
Percent income decline (n = 45)
 0–25 % 33 (73.3 %)
 26–50 % 8 (17.8 %)
 51–75 % 4 (8.9 %)
 76–100 % 0 (0.0 %)
Volume of Practice Changed (n = 71)
 Yes 53 (74.6 %)
 No 18 (25.4 %)
Reasons for volume change (n = 53)
 Patient preference to delay care 41 (77.4 %)
 Fewer referrals 36 (67.9 %)
 Greater use of telemedicine 29 (54.7 %)
 Fewer patients scheduled for social distancing 25 (47.2 %)
 Outsourcing of office procedures 3 (5.7 %)
 Increased volume 5 (9.4 %)
 Other 3 (5.7 %)
Change in on-site administrative staff
 Yes 67 (87.0 %)
 No 10 (13.0 %)
How did administrative staff change
 Staff were furloughed/laid off 27 (40.3 %)
 Work entirely remotely 27 (40.3 %)
 Part time remote 45 (67.2 %)
Work with Research staff
 Yes 31 (40.3 %)
 No 46 (59.7 %)
Change in presence of Research staff (n = 31)
 Yes 26 (83.9 %)
 No 5 (16.1 %)
How did research staff change (n = 26)
 Staff were furloughed/laid off 5 (19.2 %)
 Work entirely remotely 13 (50 %)
 Part time remote 15 (57.7 %)