Table 3.
The contrast between respondent evacuation status and socio-demographic profile.
| Indicator | Evacuee | Non-evacuee | Chi-square | Effect Size (Cramer's V/Phi) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Less than 30 yr | 21 (36.8 %) | 36 (63.2 %) | χ2 = 16.991, df = 3, sig = 0.001∗∗ | V = 0.212 |
| 30 yr to 45 yr | 66 (34 %) | 128 (66 %) | |||
| 45yr to 60 yr | 60 (57.1 %) | 45 (42.9 %) | |||
| Greater than 60 yr | 12 (54.5 %) | 10 (45.5 %) | |||
| Gender | Male | 107 (40.4 %) | 158 (59.6 %) | χ2 = 1.034, df = 1, sig = 0.309 | ϕ = -.052 |
| Female | 52 (46.0 %) | 61 (54.0 %) | |||
| Religion | Muslim | 148 (41.3 %) | 210 (58.7 %) | χ2 = 4.209, df = 2, sig = 0.122 | V = 0.106 |
| Hindu | 11 (61.1 %) | 7 (38.9 %) | |||
| Christian | 0 (0 %) | 2 (100 %) | |||
| Education | Illiterate | 67 (53.2 %) | 59 (46.8 %) | χ2 = 24.683, df = 6, sig = 0.001∗∗ | V = 0.256 |
| Class I–V | 41 (45.1 %) | 50 (54.9 %) | |||
| Class VI-X | 30 (40 %) | 45 (60 %) | |||
| SSC or Equivalent | 10 (24.4 %) | 31 (75.6 %) | |||
| HSC or Equivalent | 5 (15.2 %) | 28 (84.8 %) | |||
| Honors or Equivalent | 6 (60 %) | 4 (40 %) | |||
| Masters or Equivalent | 0 (0 %) | 2 (100 %) | |||
| Number of Family Member | 3 Member | 16 (50 %) | 16 (50 %) | χ2 = 1.087, df = 3, sig = 0.780 | V = 0.054 |
| 4 Member | 61 (42.7 %) | 82 (57.3 %) | |||
| 5 Member | 54 (40.6 %) | 79 (59.4 %) | |||
| >5 Member | 28 (40 %) | 42 (60 %) | |||
| Marital Status | Married | 153 (41.6 %) | 215 (58.4 %) | χ2 = 5.054, df = 2, sig = 0.08 | V = 0.116 |
| Unmarried | 0 (0 %) | 2 (100 %) | |||
| Widow/Divorced | 6 (75 %) | 2 (25 %) | |||
| Occupation | Agriculture/Farming | 49 (53.8 %) | 42 (46.2 %) | χ2 = 13.960, df = 3, sig = 0.003 ∗∗ | V = 0.192 |
| Business | 61 (45.9 %) | 72 (54.1 %) | |||
| Service | 34 (35.4 %) | 62 (64.6 %) | |||
| Others | 15 (25.9 %) | 43 (74.1 %) | |||
| Household Type | Pucca | 3 (6.3 %) | 45 (93.8 %) | χ2 = 100.651, df = 3, sig = 0.001∗∗ | V = 0.516 |
| Semi-Pucca | 30 (21.4 %) | 110 (78.6 %) | |||
| Katcha | 102 (63 %) | 60 (37 %) | |||
| Wooden House | 24 (85.7 %) | 4 (14.3 %) | |||
| Cattle Ownership | Yes | 124 (48.1 %) | 134 (51.9 %) | χ2 = 11.999, df = 1, sig = 0.001∗∗ | ϕ = 0.178 |
| No | 35 (29.2 %) | 85 (70.8 %) | |||
| Child Below 6 yr | Yes | 51 (40.5 %) | 75 (59.5 %) | χ2 = 0.195, df = 1, sig = 0.658 | ϕ = -0.23 |
| No | 108 (42.9 %) | 144 (57.1 %) | |||
| Old (60+) | Yes | 65 (31.7 %) | 140 (68.3 %) | χ2 = 19.712, df = 1, sig = 0.001∗∗ | ϕ = -0.228 |
| No | 94 (54.3 %) | 79 (45.7 %) | |||
| Income | <5000 BDT | 0 (0 %) | 3 (100 %) | χ2 = 7.467, df = 3, sig = 0.058 | V = 0.141 |
| 5000-10000 BDT | 54 (42.9 %) | 72 (57.1 %) | |||
| 10000 to 20000 BDT | 105 (43.4 %) | 137 (56.6 %) | |||
| 20000 to 30000 BDT | 0 (0 %) | 7 (100 %) |
Note: N = 378, Significant variables are marked with (∗∗).