Table 3.
Effects of treatment (conventional vs organic vs control), population (nested within treatment), sex, and all 2 * 2 interaction effects on biomarkers values in P. siculus
| Biomarker | df | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| AChE | |||
| Intercept | 1 | 92.50 | <0.0001 |
| BC | 1 | 0.60 | 0.442 |
| Treatment | 2 | 0.11 | 0.892 |
| Population (treatment) | 2 | 0.14 | 0.865 |
| Sex | 1 | 1.15 | 0.288 |
| Treatment*sex | 2 | 0.91 | 0.406 |
| Population (treatment)*sex | 2 | 2.61 | 0.081 |
| Error | 62 | ||
| GSTs | |||
| Intercept | 1 | 273.64 | <0.0001 |
| BC | 1 | 1.55 | 0.217 |
| Treatment | 2 | 1.93 | 0.153 |
| Population (treatment) | 2 | 0.09 | 0.915 |
| Sex | 1 | 2.49 | 0.119 |
| Treatment*sex | 2 | 1.06 | 0.354 |
| Population (treatment)*sex | 2 | 0.86 | 0.428 |
| Error | 64 | ||
| TOSCA ROO | |||
| Intercept | 1 | 19.35 | <0.0001 |
| BC | 1 | 0.67 | 0.415 |
| Treatment | 2 | 0.44 | 0.648 |
| Population (treatment) | 2 | 1.68 | 0.196 |
| Sex | 1 | 1.22 | 0.273 |
| Treatment*sex | 2 | 0.22 | 0.788 |
| Population (treatment)*sex | 2 | 0.06 | 0.942 |
| Error | 61 | ||
| TOSCA HO. | |||
| Intercept | 1 | 21.70 | <0.0001 |
| BC | 1 | 2.44 | 0.128 |
| Treatment | 2 | 4.66 | 0.025 |
| Population (treatment) | 2 | 1.28 | 0.305 |
| Sex | 1 | 14.28 | 0.002 |
| Treatment*sex | 2 | 0.25 | 0.780 |
| Population (treatment)*sex | 2 | 0.76 | 0.482 |
| Error | 16 | ||
| MN | |||
| Intercept | 1 | 4.42 | <0.0001 |
| BC | 1 | 0.56 | 0.455 |
| Treatment | 2 | 9.71 | <0.0001 |
| Population (treatment) | 2 | 2.14 | 0.127 |
| Sex | 1 | 1.20 | 0.277 |
| Treatment*sex | 2 | 0.07 | 0.931 |
| Population(treatment)*sex | 2 | 0.86 | 0.430 |
| Error | 62 | ||
Significant values are reported in bold