Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 2;63(8):1293–1304. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0

Table 1.

Overview of radiomics quality score items and mode of the respective scores in the reviewed studies

RQS checkpoint RQS item number and name Description and (points) Mode
First Item 1: image protocol quality Well-documented protocol (+1) AND/OR publicly available protocol (+1) 1
Second Item 2: multiple segmentation Testing feature robustness to segmentation variability, e.g., different physicians/algorithms/software (+1) 0
Item 3: phantom study Testing feature robustness to scanner variability, e.g., different vendors/scanners (+1) 0
Item 4: multiple time points Testing feature robustness to temporal variability, e.g., organ movement/expansion/shrinkage (+1) 0
Third Item 5: feature reduction Either feature reduction OR adjustment for multiple testing is implemented (+ 3); otherwise, (−3) 3
Item 6: multivariable analysis Non-radiomic feature are included in/considered for model building (+1) 0
Item 7: Biological correlates Detecting and discussing correlation of biology and radiomic features (+1) 0
Item 8: cut-off analysis Determining risk groups by either median, pre-defined cut-off, or continuous risk variable (+1) 0
Item 9: discrimination statistics Discrimination statistic and its statistical significance are reported (+ 1); a resampling technique is also applied (+1) 2
Item 10: calibration statistics Calibration statistic and its statistical significance are reported (+ 1); a resampling technique is also applied (+1) 0
Item 11: prospective design Prospective validation of a radiomics signature in an appropriate trial (+7) 0
Item 12: validation Validation is missing (−5) OR internal validation (+2) OR external validation on single dataset from one institute (+3) OR external validation on two datasets from two distinct institutes (+4) OR validation of a previously published signature (+4) validation is based on three or more datasets from distinct institutes (+5) 2
Item 13: comparison to “gold standard” Evaluating model’s agreement with/superiority to the current “gold standard” (+2) 0
Item 14: potential clinical application Discussing model applicability in a clinical setting (+2). 2
Item 15: cost-effectiveness analysis Performing a cost-effectiveness of the clinical application (+1) 0
Item 16: open science and data Open source scans (+1) AND/OR open source segmentations (+1) AND/OR open source code (+1) AND/OR open source representative features and segmentations (+1) 0

RQS radiomics quality score