Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 8;13:695117. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.695117

Table 2.

Details of quality evaluation via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

References Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Outcome not present at baseline Control for age and sex Control for other confounding factors Assessment of outcome Enough long follow-up duration Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts Total
Gates et al. (1996) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 7
Gates et al. (2002) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8
Gates et al. (2011) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 7
Lin et al. (2011) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Gallacher et al. (2012) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Gurgel et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Golub et al. (2017) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Deal et al. (2017) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Amieva et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Ford et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7
Vassilaki et al. (2019) 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Osler et al. (2019) 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 8
Brenowitz et al. (2019) 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 8
Brewster et al. (2021) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9