A
|
Probabilistic risk-based design |
Incorporates target reliability indices, system decomposition into subsystems (fault and event trees), and probabilistic models of stress on and capacity of the system in the design. |
B |
(Deterministic) safety factor-based design |
Incorporates multiplication factors on load and resistance variables of the system. |
C |
Fail-safe design/fail-secure design |
In engineering, a fail-safe is a design feature or practice that in the event of a specific type of failure, inherently responds in a way that will cause minimal or no harm to other equipment, to the environment, or to people [82]. Unlike inherent safety to a particular hazard, a system being “fail-safe” does not mean that failure is impossible or improbable, but rather that the system’s design prevents or mitigates unsafe consequences of the system’s failure. That is, if and when a “fail-safe” system fails, it remains at least as safe as it was before the failure. |
D |
Active safe design |
Involves a reaction to a dangerous event by user intervention. For example, in the car industry, active safety measures are already in operation prior to an accident. |
E |
Passive safe design |
Involves a reaction to a dangerous event automatically by natural laws. |
F |
Vandal-proof design |
Design against vandalism. |
G |
Idiot-proof/fool-proof design |
Design against misuse by end-users or to minimize negative consequences of abuse. |
H |
Fault-tolerant design |
System continues processing (possibly at a reduced level) when part of the system fails. |
I |
Circular design |
Design that enables maintaining product integrity (i.e., functionality and value) over a long period of time and eliminates waste. |