Table 1.
Design strategies and associated principles.
| Design Method | Principle | |
|---|---|---|
| A | Probabilistic risk-based design | Incorporates target reliability indices, system decomposition into subsystems (fault and event trees), and probabilistic models of stress on and capacity of the system in the design. |
| B | (Deterministic) safety factor-based design | Incorporates multiplication factors on load and resistance variables of the system. |
| C | Fail-safe design/fail-secure design | In engineering, a fail-safe is a design feature or practice that in the event of a specific type of failure, inherently responds in a way that will cause minimal or no harm to other equipment, to the environment, or to people [82]. Unlike inherent safety to a particular hazard, a system being “fail-safe” does not mean that failure is impossible or improbable, but rather that the system’s design prevents or mitigates unsafe consequences of the system’s failure. That is, if and when a “fail-safe” system fails, it remains at least as safe as it was before the failure. |
| D | Active safe design | Involves a reaction to a dangerous event by user intervention. For example, in the car industry, active safety measures are already in operation prior to an accident. |
| E | Passive safe design | Involves a reaction to a dangerous event automatically by natural laws. |
| F | Vandal-proof design | Design against vandalism. |
| G | Idiot-proof/fool-proof design | Design against misuse by end-users or to minimize negative consequences of abuse. |
| H | Fault-tolerant design | System continues processing (possibly at a reduced level) when part of the system fails. |
| I | Circular design | Design that enables maintaining product integrity (i.e., functionality and value) over a long period of time and eliminates waste. |