Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 13;18(12):6396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126396

Table 2.

Attitudes toward Euthanasia and Patient Autonomy (n = 135).

Statement Slightly (%) Moderately (%) Strongly (%) Irrelevant (%) Mean ± SD **
Attitudes toward assisted passive/active euthanasia (Advocates euthanasia)
Doctors must consent to the patient’s request to prevent or terminate life-preserving treatment 15 27 56 2 3.63 ± 1.15
* In any situation, the doctor should preserve the patient’s life, even if he wishes for an expedited death 53 14 29 4 1.60 ± 1.46
If a terminally ill patient suffers unbearably and is unable to make decisions, giving the patient a lethal dose of treatment should be allowed 46 15 28 11 2.54 ± 1.45
* Disconnecting CPR machines from a patient suffering from a coma is immoral 40 24 31 5 1.84 ± 1.39
If a patient is terminally ill, then he will be interested in euthanasia 14 25 53 8 3.69 ± 1.31
If a patient receives a DNR order, does the medical staff believe that the patient’s treatment is fruitless? 32 18 49 11 3.10 ± 1.50
To what extend is this true: “At the end of one’s life, it is better to end suffering than to preserve life?” 12 18 67 3 3.95 ± 1.15
Attitudes toward autonomy for patient/family members (Advocates autonomy)
If a patient is unable to make decisions, his relatives should be allowed to decide whether to maintain life-preserving therapy 34 29 33 4 2.95 ± 1.24
An individual has the right to decide whether to expedite his death 15 19 61 5 3.80 ± 1.31
Euthanasia should be allowed for any individual who requests it 18 23 54 5 3.56 ± 1.30
An individual must fill a preliminary instruction regarding his wishes in a terminal situation 11 13 73 2 4.02 ± 1.13
Doctors must include the patient and his family in making an end-of-life decision 3 10 87 0 4.51 ± 0.82

* Opposite items; the data are presented before inversion of scales. ** The average is calculated excluding the option “irrelevant”.