Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 13;18(12):6416. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126416

Table 1.

Description of the characteristics of the included papers.

Samples with Pathologies Focus Study Design Sample, Pathology,
Size, Age, % Males
PA Assessment Tool
Survey Type
Amount of PA
(Mean ± SD)
Main Findings
Assaloni et al. [12] PA level in diabetes Observational, cross-sectional N = 154 T1D
44.8 ± 12.5 y,
54.5% males
Godin Leisure Time Exercise Q.
online survey
Before L: 66 ± 42 min
During L: 38 ± 31 min
PA decreased with worst glycaemia
Barchetta et al. [13] Glycemic control in diabetes Observational, cross-sectional N = 50 T1D,
40.7 ± 13.5 y,
62% males
Q not validated
Online survey
NR Reduction of blood glucose control and weekly PA
Capaldo et al. [14] Glucose control in diabetes Observational, cross-sectional N = 207 T1D
38.4 ± 12.7 y,
53.6% males
Q not validated
Online survey
NR Increased glycemic control, more regular meals, reduced PA
Caruso et al. [15] Glucose control in diabetes Observational, cross-sectional N = 48 T1D
42.4 ± 15.9 y,
52.1% males
Q not validated
Phone interview
NR Increased glycemic control, reduced PA
Predieri et al. [16] Glycemic control in diabetes Observational, longitudinal N = 62 T1D
11.1 ± 4.4 y,
50% males
Q not validated
telemedicine
Before L: 3.27 ± 2.82 h/w
During L: 0.24 ± 0.59 h/w
Decreased PA, improved glycemic control
Tornese et al. [17] Glycemic control in diabetes Observational, cross-sectional N = 13 T1D
median age = 14.2 y,
61.5% males
Q not validated
telemedicine
During L: 3.3 h/w Regular PA at home improved glycemic control
Di Stefano et al. [18] Levels of PA in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) Observational, cross-sectional N = 268,
149 NMD patients
(57.3 ± 13.7 y,
62.4% males),
119 controls
(56 ± 6.8 y,
62.2% males)
IPAQ-SF
Phone interview
NMD
Before L: 901.3 ± 1299.6
During L: 400.6 ± 1088.5
Controls
Before L: 4506.5 ± 7600.1
During L: 2362.3 ± 4498.9
Significantly decrease of PA in both groups
Pellegrini et al. [19] Changes in weight and diet in obesity Observational, cross-sectional N = 150 obese, aged 47.9 ± 16.0, 22% males Q not validated
e-mail
Significant weight increase, reduction in PA
Sassone et al. [20] Changes in PA in patients with implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators Observational, cross-sectional N = 24 cardiac patients,
72 ± 10 y,
70.8% males
Accelerometric sensors- collected data Before L: 1.6 ± 0.5 h/day
During L: 1.2 ± 0.3 h/day
Significant reduction in PA
Schirinzi et al. [21] Changes in PA in Parkinson disease Observational, cross-sectional N = 74
Parkinson disease
61.3 ± 9.3 y,
50% males
IPAQ-SF
Online survey
During L: 1994.7 ± 1971 MET-min/w 60% of patients worsened, performing less PA
Sample without pathologies Focus Study design Sample
size, age, % males
PA assessment tool
Survey type
Amount of PA
(mean ± SD)
Main findings
Barrea et al. [22] Sleep quality, Body mass index Observational, cross-sectional N = 121
44.9 ± 13.3 y,
35.5% males
Q not validated
phone interview
NR Significant increase in mean body weight and BMI, significant decrease in PA
Buoite Stella et al. [23] Smart technologies for PA Observational, cross-sectional N = 400
35 ± 15 y,
31% males
Online survey IPAQ-SF;
daily step count measured by smart devices
Before L: 3101 ± 3815 METs
During L: 1839 ± 2254 METs
Significant reduction of performed steps and PA
Cancello et al. [24] Lifestyle changes during lockdown Observational, cross-sectional N = 490 adults
16% males
Q not validated
online survey
NR Reduction of PA in active individuals, inception of PA in sedentary individuals
Di Corrado et al. [25] Psychological status, PA Observational, cross-sectional N = 679
33.4 ± 12.8 y,
51% males
Q not validated
Online survey
NR Maintained or increased PA significantly
Di Renzo et al. [26] Eating habits and lifestyle changes Observational, cross-sectional N = 3533
aged 12–86
23.9% males
Q not validated
Online survey
NR No significant difference in PA among inactive subjects, increase in PA in subjects who used to train more than 5 times a week
Ferrante et al. [27] Impact of social isolation on lifestyle Observational, cross-sectional N = 7847
48.6 ± 13.9 y,
28.7% males
Q not validated
Online survey
NR Significant decrease in PA
Gallè et al. [28] Sedentary behaviors and PA Observational, cross-sectional N = 1430 undergraduate students, 22.9 ± 4.5 y, 34.5% males IPAQ-SF
Online survey
Before L: 520 ± 820 min/w
During L: 270 ± 340 min/w
Significantly increased sedentary lifestyle, decreased PA
Gallè et al. [29] Health-related behaviors PA Observational, cross-sectional N = 2125 undergraduate students, 22.5 ± 0.08 y, 37.2% males Questionnaire
online survey
NR Significant reduction in PA
Giustino et al. [30] Level of PA Observational, cross-sectional N = 802,
32.27 ± 12.81 y,
49% males
IPAQ-SF
online survey
Before L: 3006 MET-min/w
During L: 1483.8 MET-min/w
Significant reduction of PA, especially in males and in overweight
Luciano et al. [31] Behaviors during lockdown (PA, sedentariness, sleep) Observational, cross-sectional N = 1471
medicine students
23 ± 2 y,
30% males
IPAQ-SF
online survey
Before L: 1588 MET-min/w
During L: 960 MET-min/w
Decreased PA, and increased sitting and sleep time
Maugeri et al. [32] PA on psychological Observational, cross-sectional N = 2524
43.6% males
IPAQ
Online survey
Before L: 2429 MET-min/w
During L: 1577 MET-min/w
PA level decreased with negative impact on psychological health
Raiola et al. [33] Changes in PA Observational, cross-sectional N = 268
Mean age = 26 y
Q not validated
Online survey
NR No change in PA
Tornaghi et al. [34] PA levels Observational, cross-sectional N = 1568 students
Aged 15–18
IPAQ
Online survey
Before L: 1676.37 ± 20.6 MET-min/w
After L: 1774.50 ± 33.93 MET-min/w
Inactive or moderately active students unchanged their PA level; highly active ones increased PA level

T1D: Type 1 diabetes; PA: physical activity; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; IPAQ-SF: International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form; NR: not reported; L: lockdown.