Table 3.
Hypothesis constructs.
| Effect | Relations | Estimate | SE | 95% CI LL |
95% CI UL |
Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | ||||||
| H1: ES–IS | 0.625 *** | 0.036 | Yes | |||
| H2: JC–IS | 0.345 *** | 0.038 | 0.584 | 0.715 | Yes | |
| H3: JC–ES | 0.488 *** | 0.045 | 0.410 | 0.584 | Yes | |
| H4: IS–ITS | 0.237 * | 0.113 | 0.016 | 0.434 | Yes | |
| H5: ES–ITS | 0.321 ** | 0.097 | 0.135 | 0.497 | Yes | |
| Mediating | ||||||
| H6: JC–IS–ITS | 0.082 * | 0.074 | 0.009 | 0.158 | Yes | |
| H7: JC–ES–ITS | 0.157 *** | 0.048 | 0.065 | 0.256 | Yes | |
| H8: JC–ES–IS–ITS | 0.072 * | 0.037 | 0.006 | 0.150 | Yes |
Note 1: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Note 2: IS: intrinsic satisfaction, ES: extrinsic satisfaction; JC: job competency; ITS: intention to stay.