Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 21;9(7):e003079. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003079

Table 2.

Changes from baseline in CT and 18F-FLT PET parameters according to confirmed treatment response

All subjects,
n=25
Non-progressive disease,
n=16
Progressive disease,
n=9
P value*
Changes between baseline and week 2
 ΔSUVmax0-2, % 6.0 (−58.3 to 120.2) 2.1 (−58.3 to 50.9) 16.8 (−34.8 to 120.2) 0.075
 ΔPTV0-2, % 29.0 (−90.7 to 813.2) 12.5 (−90.7 to 241.9) 101.3 (−27.0 to 813.2) 0.066
 ΔTLP0-2, % 31.9 (−94.8 to 821.3) 12.7 (−94.8 to 223.2) 81.6 (−15.9 to 821.3) 0.045
All subjects,
n=22
Non-progressive disease,
n=16
Progressive disease,
n=6
P value*
Changes between baseline and week 6
 ΔSUVmax0-6, % −3.4 (-72.3 to 88.1) −17.5 (-72.3 to 17.3) 26.3 (-34.8 to 88.1) 0.020
 ΔPTV0-6, % −31.2 (−96.9 to 2528.1) −54.7 (−96.9 to 67.1) 95.0 (−23.9 to 2528.2) 0.0017
 ΔTLP0-6, % −24.9 (−97.1 to 3075.2) −58.1 (−97.1 to 66.8) 123.2 (−19.2 to 3075.2) 0.0022

*P values compare the non-progressive and progressive disease groups.

18F-FLT, 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]-fluorothymidine; PET, positron emission tomography; PTV, proliferative tumor volume; SUV, standardized uptake value; TLP, total lesion proliferation.