Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;36(5):723–733. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa110

Table 4.

Hierarchical regression analysis with informant reported IADLs as criterion

Predictor ß t ΔF (df) F (df) ΔR  2 R  2
Step 1 12.30*** (2,117) .17
 Age .21 2.48*
 Education −.33 −3.91***
Step 2 11.50*** (2,115) 13.00*** (4,115) .14 .31
 Age .16 2.00*
 Education −.26 −3.26**
 Switching-ST-RT .33 3.83***
 Spatial WM −.10 −1.19
Step 3 4.48*** (6,109) 8.83*** (10,109) .14 .45
 Age .15 2.05*
 Education −.21 −2.80**
 Switching-ST-RT .33 3.68***
 Spatial WM −.08 −1.00
 WM updating −.36 −4.44***
 Flanker interference .03 0.35
 GNG-Hits .12 1.40
 GNG-nogo-ACC −.06 −0.82
 Switching-SC .23 3.00**
 Switching-MC .15 1.79

Note. IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale; ß = standardized regression weight; ST = single-task trials of the switching task; RT = response time; WM = working memory; GNG = go/no-go task; nogo-ACC = correct rejections; SC = switch cost; MC = mixing cost.

*p < .05.

**p < .01.

***p < .001.