Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 8.
Published before final editing as: Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Oct 8:10.1002/alz.12199. doi: 10.1002/alz.12199

Table 5.

Odds ratio between definition of dementia by HRS survey and claims based coding algorithm

Cognitive impairment defined by HRS survey ADRD defined by claims based coding algorithm
Total Relative Risk Odds Ratio
No Yes (%) (95% CI) (95% CI) p-value
Age 75
No 4,035
(98.22%)
73
(1.78%)
4,108 (95.74%) 23.04
(18.07, 29.39)
49.01
(33.81, 71.04)
<0.0001

Yes 97
(53.00%)
86
(47.00%)
183
(4.26%)

Total (%) 4,132
(96.29%)
159 (3.71%) 4,291 (100.00%)

Age 80
No 3,064
(96.50%)
111
(3.50%)
3,175 (92.54%) 16.01
(12.96, 19.78)
35.49
(26.00, 48.45)
<0.0001

Yes 112
(43.75%)
144
(56.25%)
256
(7.46%)

Total (%) 3,176
(92.57%)
255 (7.43%) 3,431 (100.00%)

Age 85
No 2,048
(92.75%)
160
(7.25%)
2,208
(88.71%)
10.49
(8.49, 12.96)
20.81
(15.58, 27.81)
<0.0001

Yes 107
(38.08%)
174
(61.92%)
281
(11.29%)

Total 2,155
(86.58%)
334
(13.42%)
2,489 (100.00%)

Table 5 compares our ADRD definition based on the claims-based algorithm with the HRS definition of cognitive impairment. The relative risk is the multiplicative increase in the probability of cognitive impairment by the HRS survey predicted by our measure of ADRD. The odds ratio is the multiplicative increase in odds of cognitive impairment by the HRS survey predicted by our measure of ADRD.