Table 6.
MM3 | MM4 | MM5 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Advantage | Rate † | Rate † | Rate † | df | t-Test | p-Value |
|
171.7 | - | 147.9 | 2878 | 16.378 | 0.000 * |
|
158.2 | - | 150.4 | 2612 | 4.499 | 0.000 * |
|
173.5 | - | 145.2 | 3073 | 18.297 | 0.000 * |
|
173.5 | - | 145.9 | 2388 | 2.859 | 0.004 * |
Disadvantage | Rate † | Rate † | Rate † | df | ANOVA | p-value |
|
174.0 | 157.6 | 144.5 | 2, 7519 | 1224.907 | 0.000 * |
|
176.2 | 157.6 | 141.0 | 2, 7253 | 809.219 | 0.000 * |
|
174.1 | 157.6 | 148.7 | 2, 7057 | 645.853 | 0.000 * |
|
175.2 | 157.6 | 147.4 | 2, 7743 | 933.041 | 0.000 * |
† per 1000 children population per year: MM3: Large Rural Town; MM4: Medium Rural Town; MM5: Small Rural Town. * p < 0.01.