Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 4;18(13):7159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137159

Table 1.

Characteristics of tools for measure HRQoL in IBD.

Target Recall Period Number of Items Response
Options
Range of Scores (Worst-Best) Reliability
Specific-disease tools IBDQ-32 IBD 2 weeks 32 7-Level Likert (1–7) 32–224 +++
SIBDQ IBD 2 weeks 10 7-Level Likert (1–7) 10–70 ++
IBDQ-36 IBD 2 weeks 36 7-Level Likert (1–7) 36–252 NA
IBDQ-9 IBD 2 weeks 9 7-Level Likert (1–7) 0–100 ++
CUCQ-8 IBD 2 weeks 8 4-Level Likert (0–3) or ordinal format (0–14) 90–0 +++
CLIQ CD Today 27 True/Not true (1–0) 27–0 +++
IBDQ-D UC-IPAA 2 weeks 32 7-Level Likert (1–7) 32–224 NA
CAF-QoL CD 6–8 weeks 28 4-Level Likert (0–4) 112–0 +++
Generic tools SF-36 Patients and general population 4 weeks 36 Linear transformation of raw scores 0–100 +++
EQ-5D Patients and general population Today 6
  • − 3-Likert (1–3)

  • − 5-Likert (1–5)

  • − visual analogue scale

243 health status, index 0–1
  • − 0–100

+++

+ Poor, ++ Fair, +++ Good.