Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;18(13):7069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137069

Table 2.

Discriminant validity evaluation of the measurement model using HTMT.

Constructo RWD STR WLB WP WS WC
RWD 0.780
STR 0.340 [0.271, 0.406] 0.802
WLB 0.330 [0.264, 0.398] 0.285 [0.229, 0.339] 1.00
WP 0.108 [0.067, 0.165] 0.185 [0.125, 0.245] 0.173 [0.121, 0.227] 1.00
WS 0.326 [0.258, 0.395] 0.417 [0.364, 0.466] 0.356 [0.305, 0.411] 0.382 [0.330, 0.431] 1.00
WC 0.147 [0.089, 0.217] 0.189 [0.127, 0.250] 0.088 [0.032, 0.143] 0.341 [0.285, 0.396] 0.306 [0.253, 0.356] 1.00

Note: On the diagonal, the square root of AVE. HTMT is shown above the diagonal; numbers in brackets represent the 95% bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals derived from bootstrapping with 5000 samples.