Table 3.
Variables | Age | Gender | FEL | MEL | PA | POS | NEG | AB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 1.00 | |||||||
Gender | 0.04 | 1.00 | ||||||
FEL | −0.23 *** | −0.01 | 1.00 | |||||
MEL | −0.25 *** | −0.03 | 0.66 *** | 1.00 | ||||
PA | −0.07 * | −0.16 *** | 0.11 *** | 0.12 *** | 1.00 | |||
POS | 0.01 | −0.22 *** | 0.08 ** | 0.06 * | 0.38 *** | 1.00 | ||
NEG | −0.03 | 0.08 ** | 0.09 ** | 0.09 ** | 0.31 *** | 0.40 *** | 1.00 | |
AB | 0.09 ** | 0.16 *** | −0.03 | −0.01 | −0.17 *** | −0.16 *** | −0.20 *** | 1.00 |
Mean | 14.86 | — | 2.49 | 2.3 | 2.78 | 4.05 | 3.4 | 1.58 |
SD | 1.87 | — | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.6 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.82 |
Note: n = 1171. Gender was dummy coded as 0 (=female) and 1 (=male). FEL, father’s education level; MEL, mother’s education level; PA, peer attachment; AB, aggressive behavior. Father’s and mother’s education level were rated on a 4-point scale (“1 = primary school or below” to “4 = graduate degree”). POS, self-efficacy in expressing positive emotions; NEG, self-efficacy in managing negative emotions; SD, standard deviation. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.