Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 22;278(12):4871–4881. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06987-z

Table 5.

Logistic regression analyses results for predictors to favorable response to carbonation

OR
95% CI
Responder:
Penetration to normal, Aspiration to penetration/normal
Non-responder:
No change in category or penetration to aspiration, normal to penetration/aspiration
Responder: PAScarb < PASthin
Non-responder: PAScarb ≤ PASthin
Etiology 1 vs 2

0.54

(0.02, 4.80)

1.05

(0.17, 5.55)

Etiology 1 vs 3

7.91a

(1.68, 47.53)

10.99a

(2.57, 59.93)

Etiology 1 vs 4

1.00

(0.04, 11.14)

0.53

(0.02, 5.11)

Age (years)

0.98

(0.93, 1.02)

0.96a

(0.92, 1.00)

Sex

0.90

(0.18, 4.04)

1.31

(0.32,5.30)

Laryngeal anatomy (normal/abnormal)

2.70

(0.51, 15.21)

2.19

(0.46, 11.03)

Larynx sensation (2,3)

1.16

(0.31, 4.28)

1.74

(0.53, 5.95)

3.23

(0.12, 45.67)

1.80

(0.07, 20.67)

MSS (1,2,3)

0.23

(0.01, 2.27)

1.36

(0.21, 8.79)

1.30

(0.23, 8.15)

3.16

(0.59, 20.26)

2.39

(0.45, 14.96)

1.72

(0.34, 9.64)

FOIS

1.00

(0.65, 1.56)

1.09

(0.75, 1.64)

Constant

0.61

(0.01, 28.81)

1.40

(0.04, 53.10)

Observations 81 81

PAS penetration aspiration scale; MSS Murray’s secretion scale; FOIS Functional Oral Intake Score. Etiology groups: (1) neurogenic, (2) head and neck oncology- and radiation-related, (3) deconditioning-related, (4) non-oncologic neck surgery-related. OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval

aP < 0.05