Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Sci (Basel). 2020 Sep 6;10(18):6187. doi: 10.3390/app10186187

Table 2.

Comparison of ACDC and the tested ImageJ pipelines in terms of cell nuclei counting and segmentation. The results are expressed as mean value ± standard deviation.

Method Dataset Pearson Coeff. (p-Value) DSC (%) IoU (%)
ACDC VU ρ = 0.99 (p = 6.6 × 10−74) 76.84 ± 6.71 62.84 ± 8.58
ImageJ (witd Gaussian filt er) VU ρ = 0.99 (p = 9.5 × 10−75) 74.97 ± 6.17 60.32 ± 7.62
ImageJ (without Gaussian filter) VU ρ = 0.99 (p = 5.3 × 10−44) 74.43 ± 6.20 59.62 ± 7.61

ACDC DSB ρ = 0.96 (p = 2.6 × 10−169) 88.64 ± 7.41 80.37 ± 10.58
ImageJ (with Gaussian filter) DSB ρ = 0.97 (p = 5.7 × 10−205) 86.50 ± 6.86 76.78 ± 9.66
ImageJ (without Gaussian filter) DSB ρ = 0.97 (p = 3.4 × 10−207) 86.68 ± 7.75 77.23 ± 10.86